that's not a gripe for this list.Ģ) The problem with Acrobat's redaction method from the accessibility point of view is that Acrobat by default leaves no indication that a redaction has occurred. I also loathe Acrobat's selection model for redaction purposes, but I digress. This might be fine for many applications, but national security agencies and other professionally paranoid types may feel otherwise. There's nothing left for AT to voice / zoom on / whatever, but the document structure is *not* redacted along with the content. text!!) remain in the tags tree even though they're been removed from the document.
Accordingly, the fact of paragraphs, images, lists, etc. While it removes content from the page it leaves the tags as-is. There are, however, several things a responsible redactor needs to know that aren't altogether obvious.ġ) Acrobat's redaction isn't comprehensive.
REDACTED EMAIL PDF
It's true you can redact PDF documents using Acrobat (and it's not the only such tool). PDF, wherein each page essentially consists of lots of little drawings, is ideal in the vast majority of cases that don't involve a grease-pen or an Exacto knife (the traditional tools of redaction). While some plugins are available (or so I've heard), successful redaction is rare in these formats they just aren't well-suited to content removal. Previous message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Redacted Text (was Strike-through Text)"įirst: Word and HTML.Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Redacted Text (was Strike-through Text)".Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Redacted Text (was Strike-through Text)".Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Redacted Text (was Strike-through Text)".
0 kommentar(er)
